On Jul 19, 2019, Delaware court denied both
motions filed by Genentech.
Genentech filed 2 motions which require Amgen
to provide new 180-day commercial marketing notice & temporary restraining order
(TRO). Amgen’s biosimilar (Mvasi : bevacizumab-awwb) product was approved in
Sep 2017. In Oct. 2017, Amgen sent Genentech a Notice of Commercial Marketing
Under§ 262(1)(8)(A). Amgen then filed supplements which FDA approved in Dec. 2018
& Jun. 2019 for change in drug substance manufacturing facility & change
in labeling respectively. On July 10, 2019, Genentech filed above 2 motions.
Genentech argued that Mvasi product made
pursuant to the specifications approved by the FDA in June 2019 is "a distinct
'product licensed under subsection (k)' requiring its own notice" because
it is "a new product made by a new manufacturing process, accompanied by a
new label, and the subject of separate applications, FDA reviews, and FDA
approvals. But Court denied the motions & held that Amgen is not required
to give new marketing notice because it is the same product. Though FDA
approved the later supplements which require facility & labelling changes
but it does change “biological product”. BPCIA's language makes clear that a
biologic product is not defined by its manufacturing facilities or labeling. Court
also said that nothing in the BPCIA states or even suggests that an applicant
cannot file or the FDA cannot approve a supplement filed after the FDA approved
the underlying application (or an earlier supplement).
With respect to TRO, court already found
that Genentech cannot succeed on the merits because it has failed to establish
a likelihood of success & thus denied this motion also.
No comments:
Post a Comment