On Sep
18, 2019, Delaware court judge rejected Sun Pharma’s contention that its settlement
with Amgen entitles Sun to launch its generic version.
Amgen sued Sun in Sep. 2016 for filing ANDA to market generic version of
Sensipar®. The Parties settled & entered into Settlement Agreement
on Oct. 24, 2017. On Aug. 24, 2018, Court entered a judgment of non-infringement
in favor of Piramal, Amneal and Watson (Teva). On Dec 27, 2018, FDA approved
Watson / Teva’s ANDA & on Dec. 28, Teva launched generic product in US
market. Shortly thereafter, on Jan 2, 2019, Amgen and Teva reached a settlement
agreement whereby Teva acknowledged that its generic product infringed the US 9,375,405
patent and agreed that it would immediately cease sales of this product. Also,
on Jan 2, 2019, in order to comply with its notification duties outlined in
section 5.3 of the Agreement, Amgen notified Sun of Teva’s launch and of their
subsequent settlement.
Main dispute in this case was related to the part of Agreement
which relates to Amgen’s obligations if other manufacturers of generic
Cinacalcet entered the market at risk. Sun argued that it is entitled to a
license under Section 5 of the Agreement. Specifically, Section 5.2(b) states
that the “Entry Date” could be the
earlier of “the Launch of a Generic
Cinacalcet Product by a Third Party,
Amgen, or an Amgen Affiliate, except as provided under Section 5.5.” Section
5.5 outlines Amgen’s obligations if a Third Party engages in an “At-Risk Launch. According to it, Amgen need to enter into an
agreement with each such Third Party selling such Generic Cinacalcet Product
requiring each such Third Party to cease
and desist from selling such Generic Cinacalcet Product form the market
within 30 days of such agreement, then Amgen will not seek a temporary
restraining order or preliminary injunction against Sun.
Sun urges that, based on Amgen’s deficient response to
Teva’s market entry, it is entitled to a license to sell its generic
Cinacalcet. Sun’s argument rests primarily on its claim that despite Teva’s
launch and downstream sales, Amgen did not contract with each downstream
distributor to effectuate a cease and desist regarding the selling of the
Teva product. Per Sun’s reading of the Agreement, such authorized downstream
sales trigger application of section 5.2 of the Agreement, thus granting Sun a
license to enter the market.
Court however, disagreed & said that Amgen complied with
Section 5.5(a)(ii) as it did in fact enter into a cease and desist agreement
with Teva five days after Teva entered the market. Sun reads this language
differently, urging that it obligates Amgen to effectuate “any further sale
of such Generic Cinacalcet Product” by both Teva and all Third-Party
distributors. In short, relying on language that simply does not exist, Sun
insists that Amgen must have “policed the market,” – that is, policed both Teva
and Third-Party distributors. Court disagreed with Sun’s interpretation for
several reasons.
First and foremost, Amgen’s cease and desist obligations
under the Agreement refers to Third Parties who engaged in at risk launch. It
is undisputed that distributors and resalers did not engage in at-risk launch –
only Teva did. Thus, reading the agreement as a whole, Court concluded that a
“Third Party” does not include distributors. The Agreement is absolutely silent
that this obligation also includes distributor resales and downstream
purchasers.
Second, there simply is no language in the Agreement to
support Sun’s contention that Amgen agreed to remove all generic products from
the market, or that Amgen had a duty to police the entire market after such a
launch. Reading section 5.5 as a whole, “each such Third Party” can only refer
to Teva because only the generic manufacturer has the ability to be the first
to sell the specific generic Cinacalcet product in the United States. And Teva
was the only third party to have “Launched” a generic Cinacalcet.
Therefore, under this construction, Sun is not granted a
license to market its Generic Cinacalcet Product at this time.
No comments:
Post a Comment