On May 25, 2018, the Paris Court of First Instance revoked
the SPC on the combination of "tenofovir disoproxil &
emtricitabine", marketed under trade name Truvada® by Gilead.
As per the decision summary reported on ‘SPC blog’, the
Paris Court of First Instance held that "the patent on the basis of which
the SPC 0032 was granted does not mention emtricitabine in the wording of its
claims, neither makes it necessarily and specifically identifiable, nor does it
mention a functional formula implicitly but necessarily and specifically.
Gilead holds European patent No EP 0 915 894 (‘the basic
patent’). This patent was expired on 24 July 2017. It covers, in general terms,
a series of molecules, which are helpful in the therapeutic treatment of a
number of viral infections in humans and animals, in particular HIV. Claim 27,
which is important here, reads as:
‘A pharmaceutical composition
comprising a compound according to any one of claims 1 to 25 together with a
pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and optionally other therapeutic
ingredients’.
Previously on Sep. 05, 2017 the High Court of Paris issued
its decision on the validity of the Gilead SPC on Truvada® & denied
injunction because of chances that SPC may be found invalid.
On similar line various courts have decided this issue:
On May 15, 2018, Federal Patent Court (FPC) of Germany
revoked SPC to Gilead’s product, Truvada® in a validity proceeding challenged
by generic filers.
On Apr. 25, 2018, in a request for a preliminary ruling,
Advocate General Wathelet (UK) revoked the SPC.
On Oct. 26, 2017, the Danish Maritime and Commercial High
Court issued a decision rejecting Gilead's motion for preliminary injunction
against Accord Healthcare & found Gilead's Danish SPC for the combination invalid.
On Oct. 3, 2017, the Federal Patent Court of Switzerland rejected
the application for annulment of SPC & held that it is only required by the
law that the product is protected by a patent under fosinopril decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment