On Feb 28, 2017, The Federal Circuit ruled that the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board incorrectly invalidated Los
Angeles Biomedical Research Institute’s patent on drug Cialis (Tadalafil) for treating a condition
related to erectile dysfunction based on obviousness. The patent-in-suit is
U.S. Patent Number 8,133,903.
In two separate opinions (anticipation & obviousness) Federal
Circuit affirmed the validity of US’903 patent challenged by Eli Lilly. With
respect to obviousness court held that because the Board’s obviousness
determination was predicated on an erroneous claim construction of two of the
limitations of claim 1, and because the Board did not make factual findings as
to whether there was an apparent reason to combine the prior art references to
treat penile fibrosis and whether a person of skill in the art would have had a
reasonable expectation of success from such a combination, we remand this case
to the Board.
With respect to anticipation court affirmed PTAB decision & said that the reference
“Whitaker” may suggest” long term daily treatment by noting the beneficial
effects of daily treatment (better erectile response and decreased side
effects) in light of Example 6, but that is not enough. To anticipate, a
reference must do more than “suggest” the claimed subject matter. Thus, we hold
that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that Whitaker does not
disclose the claimed treatment regimen with sufficient clarity to satisfy the
demanding standard for anticipation.
No comments:
Post a Comment