IPR decision: Feb. 05, 2020
AIA Review #
|
Filing Date
|
Institution Date
|
Petitioner
|
Patent
|
Respondent
|
FINAL WRITTEN
DECSION
|
IPR2018-01403
|
07/13/2018
|
02/06/2019
|
Mylan
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
8,399,514
|
Biogen Idec MA Inc.
|
Claims 1-20 are patentable
|
On US’514 patent,
Coalition for Affordable Drugs previously filed IPRs (IPR2015-01136 &
IPR2015-01993) on 05/01/2015 & 09/28/2015. IPR2015-01136 was terminated
& in IPR2015-01993, Final Written Decision was issued by PTAB finding
claims 1-20 patentable. Sawai also filed IPR (IPR2019-00789) which was
instituted on 09/12/2019.
US 8,399,514 (Biogen Idec;
Exp: Feb 07, 2028) – OB listed
1. A method of treating a subject in need of treatment for multiple sclerosis comprising orally
administering to the subject in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition
consisting essentially of (a) a therapeutically effective amount of dimethyl
fumarate, monomethyl fumarate, or a combination thereof, and (b) one or more
pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, wherein the therapeutically effective
amount of dimethyl fumarate, monomethyl fumarate, or a combination thereof is
about 480 mg per day.
11. A method of treating a subject in need of treatment for multiple sclerosis consisting
essentially of orally administering to the subject about 480 mg per day of dimethyl fumarate, monomethyl fumarate, or a
combination thereof.
15. A method of treating a subject in need of treatment for multiple sclerosis comprising orally
administering to the subject pharmaceutical composition consisting essentially
of (a) a therapeutically effective amount of dimethyl fumarate and (b) one or
more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, wherein the therapeutically
effective amount of dimethyl fumarate is about 480 mg per day.
20. A method of treating a subject in need of treatment for multiple sclerosis comprising treating
the subject in need thereof with a therapeutically effective amount of dimethyl
fumarate, monomethyl fumarate, or a combination thereof, wherein the
therapeutically effective amount of dimethyl fumarate, monomethyl fumarate, or
a combination thereof is about 480 mg
per day.
PTAB analysis:
Mylan filed IPR petition citing different prior arts essentially
disclosing different dosage ranges (360 mg/day and 720 mg/day) of dimethyl
fumarate (DMF) for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). None of the prior art
disclosed specific 480 mg dose for the treatment of MS. The central question
before PTAB was whether discovery of the 480 mg/day dose of DMF in a method of
treating multiple sclerosis was obvious because of dose optimization within an
established effective range. PTAB said that “discovery of an optimum value of a
variable in a known process is usually obvious.” Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., 480 F.3d 1348, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2007); see
also In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456 (CCPA 1955) (“[W]here the general
conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to
discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation.”)
PTAB said that most of the prior arts cited by petitioner cast
doubt on lower range, ie 360 mg/day dose. However, there is teaching in the
arts about 720 mg/day dose of DMF. In absence of the specific lower range it
would not have been routine dose optimization. In one of the ground, PTAB agreed
with petitioner & said that prior arts (Kappos
2006 and WO ’342) disclose each claim limitation in the combination of
references & POSA would have been motivated to optimize the daily dose of DMF
with a reasonable expectation of success. But the patent owner’s evidence of unexpected
result overcomes the obviousness challenge. Specifically, 480 mg/day dose was
found in fact as efficacious as 720 mg/day dose. Additionally both USFDA &
EMA have considered the results & allowed marketing application with 480
mg/day dose. PTAB thus concluded that weight of the evidence on this record
sufficiently establishes that the comparable efficacy between the 480 mg/day
and 720 mg/day doses would have been unexpected. Therefore, challenged claims
1-20 are not unpatentable.
No comments:
Post a Comment